https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/23/opinion/cuba-embargo.html?rref=collection%2Ftimestopic%2FEconomic%20Conditions%20and%20Trends&action=click&contentCollection=timestopics®ion=stream&module=stream_unit&version=latest&contentPlacement=6&pgtype=collection
I stumbled upon this economic trend recently when I was reading the New York Times online. that being said, this article points to the economic feud between Cuba and the United States that lasted roughly 60 years and was the result of political tensions incurred during America's cold war with the Soviet Union. Lifting the imposed embargo might however, open up economic opportunities to both nations and allow for increased trade to come into effect. Increased trade aims to benefit communities in the long run. The prototypical customer for a lifted embargo would be economically struggling communities along Florida's coast that are affected by limited access to resources. Access to trade would allow for these communities to become increasingly self-sufficient. The opportunity might be difficult to exploit given the fact that it deals with international relations primarily and actually requires legal intervention. I saw the opportunity due to the fact that I mainly grew up overseas and can distinctly see the need for increased global cohesion. This globalization allows for better understanding and less ethnocentricity in the long run.
Regulatory Trend #1
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/23/world/africa/south-africa-corruption.html?rref=collection%2Ftimestopic%2FEconomic%20Conditions%20and%20Trends&action=click&contentCollection=timestopics®ion=stream&module=stream_unit&version=latest&contentPlacement=7&pgtype=collection
Whilst reading the same New York Times as previously mentioned, I also stumbled upon this article that identifies a new regulatory shift towards ending corruption in South Africa. South African President Cyril Ramaphosa pledged to lead a new policy change geared towards legal precautions that would protect against corruption. President Ramaphosa has stated that the African nation cannot carry on with the way politics and negotiations have typically been presented since most have lost confidence in South Africa as a nation. Efforts to change the African National Congress have already taken part with various anti-corruption bills that have been passed in recent months. The prototypical customer might be those in official positions in South Africa who seek to promote a better standard of politics. The opportunity might be difficult to exploit given the nature of its governmental and political regulation. I saw this opportunity given the fact that I similarly saw corruption in our own UF Student Government when I was involved and see this article as a call to action.
Economic Trend #2
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/20/business/china-economy-growth-davos.html?rref=collection%2Ftimestopic%2FEconomic%20Conditions%20and%20Trends&action=click&contentCollection=timestopics®ion=stream&module=stream_unit&version=latest&contentPlacement=16&pgtype=collection
I identified this economic trend by reading over the Economics section of the New York Times newspaper. This article talks about the slowdown of China's economy as strong growth and low unemployment rates fizzle out due to rising interest-rates and the resurgence of European economic markets. This information exists to show that China is a plausible environment for investment given the need for a boost and increasing foreign investment. The most likely customer would be foreign investors of even government agencies wanting to bolster the Chinese economy through investment and economic input. The opportunity is probably a medium difficulty to exploit given the fact that China has opened up opportunities for foreign interaction recently through decreased tariffs and economic quotas. I saw this opportunity through my diverse background. I feel comfortable with the notion that globalization benefits most through increased access to information and tighter bonds when it comes to an economic sense.
Regulatory Trend #2
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/18/opinion/trump-government-shutdown.html?rref=collection%2Ftimestopic%2FEconomic%20Conditions%20and%20Trends&action=click&contentCollection=timestopics®ion=stream&module=stream_unit&version=latest&contentPlacement=18&pgtype=collection
I saw this article in the New York Times whilst I was looking at regulatory changes that were going to take effect in America. The recent government shutdown impacted hundreds of thousands across the States. That being said, the Department of Agriculture has imposed new regulations aimed at providing farmers with access to loans and grants that would keep them in business during trying times. This would mean that federal lunch programs at schools will also maintain standards of quality due to farmer access to necessary resources. An opportunity might exist to impose new regulations due to the fact that outdated governmental practices have hindered significant American agricultural growth in the past few decades. The prototypical customer is essentially the average American farmer looking to stay employed during tough times. This means that the opportunity should be easy enough to exploit since regulation related to agricultural exploits is readily available to take into effect. Thus, opportunities within farming communities exist. I saw the opportunity due to the fact that my best friend's family is involved in agriculture. This simply means that I can see the problem in person when I hear his firsthand accounts of the issue at hand.
